Purpose, itinerary and trip credibility
Requested duration is disproportionate to the stated purpose
Not a statutory bar. It affects whether the officer is satisfied, and better evidence can change that.
What this means
A long proposed stay is not automatically prohibited, but it can become difficult to reconcile with a short event, full-time employment, a business that requires the applicant, or limited travel funds.
Why it matters to the officer
Most visitors may be admitted for up to six months, but the visa officer still decides whether the applicant has established a genuine temporary purpose and will leave as required.
What the officer compares
The length of the trip compared with approved leave, income, business responsibilities, school calendar, family obligations, accommodation and overall cost.
How to strengthen a new application
Choose a duration that genuinely fits the purpose. If a longer stay is necessary, explain the reason and show how work/business/family obligations are managed and why return on the stated date remains credible.
Common mistakes
Assuming “six months is allowed” means six months should be requested; inflating a short family event into a months-long trip without explanation.
- Assuming “six months is allowed” means six months should be requested
- inflating a short family event into a months-long trip without explanation
Illustrative exampleA five-day wedding followed by a 75-day unexplained stay may raise questions. If the applicant genuinely plans an extended family visit, the file should explain and finance that entire period.
Before you apply again
IRCC now sends the officer’s decision note with most temporary-resident refusals since 29 July 2025, so check what came with your refusal first. The decision note or GCMS notes guide explains the difference, and the decoder explains the codes in them.
Scope noteIRCC does not publish an official ranked list of refusal reasons. This is a research-based classification of the legal grounds and evidence weaknesses that recur in real refusals. A weak itinerary or a new job is not itself a statutory ground — it affects whether the officer is satisfied under IRPR 179(b). This page is general information, not legal advice.
Where this comes from
Drawn from the Government of Canada’s published law and guidance. Check us against these pages:
Questions about this refusal
Not sure this is why you were refused?
Check first whether IRCC sent you the officer’s decision note with the refusal. For the fuller record, we can request your GCMS notes for you, or you can request them yourself, free, subject to what IRCC withholds.
Have us request them for youDo it yourself or let us do it?
