Government-LicensedLicence849/DC/PTA/PLA/LC-3/2024Valid till 22/07/2029
CAIPS Notes ApplyGCMS · CAIPS · CBSA Notes

Reason 6 of 50 · Purpose, itinerary and trip credibility

Accommodation plan is unclear or inconsistent

Classified asPurpose / financial credibility issue

YOUR FILEVISA OFFICERassesses6
Evidence weakness — fixableThis is not a statutory bar. It affects whether the officer is satisfied, and better evidence can change that.

What this actually means

The applicant does not clearly show where they will stay, or the accommodation evidence conflicts with the invitation or itinerary.

Why it matters to the officer

Accommodation is part of both purpose and cost. IRCC lists proof of accommodation as itinerary evidence, and whether a visitor stays in a hotel or with relatives affects how much money may be required.

IRPR 179 — WHAT THE OFFICER MUST BE SATISFIED OFYou applied in the correct wayYou will LEAVE by the end of your stayYou hold a valid travel documentYou are not inadmissibleMost visitor refusals turn on the second line — s. 179(b).

What the officer compares

Host address versus hotel bookings, number of nights, who is paying, whether all cities are covered, and whether the accommodation fits the stated relationship.

THE OFFICER CROSS-CHECKSHost address versus hotel bookingsnumber of nightswho is payingwhether all cities are covered

Weak file vs strong file

The same situation, presented two ways. The right-hand column is what a reapplication needs to look like.

WHAT WEAKENS ITWHAT STRENGTHENS ITBooking one night merely to createa documentProvide coherent accommodationevidence and explain mixedclaiming to stay with family whilesubmitting full-period hotelsif using hotels, ensure dates andcities match the itineraryleaving multi-city gaps

How to strengthen a reapplication

Provide coherent accommodation evidence and explain mixed arrangements. If staying with a host, make that clear in the invitation; if using hotels, ensure dates and cities match the itinerary.

Common mistakes

Booking one night merely to create a document; claiming to stay with family while submitting full-period hotels; leaving multi-city gaps.

Illustrative example

A 20-day trip with hotel proof for only three nights is not automatically fatal, but the remaining accommodation should be explained.

Before you reapply

THE ONLY SEQUENCE THAT WORKS1Read the notesFind the real reason2Fix that one thi…Not everything at on…3Prove it with do…Evidence, not claims4Then reapplyAnswering the object…

You cannot fix a reason you have not read. Your GCMS notes contain the officer's own words about your file, and requesting them is free we publish every step.

Scope note. IRCC does not publish an official ranked list of refusal reasons. This is a research-based classification of the legal grounds and evidence weaknesses that recur in real refusals. A weak itinerary or a new job is not itself a statutory ground — it affects whether the officer is satisfied under IRPR 179(b). Source references for this entry: [S2], [S4], [S7]. This page is general information, not legal advice.

Questions people ask about this refusal

The applicant does not clearly show where they will stay, or the accommodation evidence conflicts with the invitation or itinerary.

Accommodation is part of both purpose and cost. IRCC lists proof of accommodation as itinerary evidence, and whether a visitor stays in a hotel or with relatives affects how much money may be required.

Host address versus hotel bookings, number of nights, who is paying, whether all cities are covered, and whether the accommodation fits the stated relationship.

Provide coherent accommodation evidence and explain mixed arrangements. If staying with a host, make that clear in the invitation; if using hotels, ensure dates and cities match the itinerary.

Booking one night merely to create a document; claiming to stay with family while submitting full-period hotels; leaving multi-city gaps.

No. IRCC states that refiling the same information will likely not change the decision. A reapplication has to answer the specific concern the officer recorded — which is why you should read your GCMS notes first and find out exactly what that concern was.

Not sure this is why you were refused?

Most refusals cite more than one concern, and only one of them is usually decisive. Your GCMS notes say which. Get them free, or send them to us and we will tell you exactly what to fix.

More in “Purpose, itinerary and trip credibility

See all 50 refusal reasons →

CallWhatsApp