Purpose, itinerary and trip credibility
Accommodation plan is unclear or inconsistent
Not a statutory bar. It affects whether the officer is satisfied, and better evidence can change that.
What this means
The applicant does not clearly show where they will stay, or the accommodation evidence conflicts with the invitation or itinerary.
Why it matters to the officer
Accommodation is part of both purpose and cost. IRCC lists proof of accommodation as itinerary evidence, and whether a visitor stays in a hotel or with relatives affects how much money may be required.
What the officer compares
Host address versus hotel bookings, number of nights, who is paying, whether all cities are covered, and whether the accommodation fits the stated relationship.
How to strengthen a new application
Provide coherent accommodation evidence and explain mixed arrangements. If staying with a host, make that clear in the invitation; if using hotels, ensure dates and cities match the itinerary.
- Provide coherent accommodation evidence and explain mixed arrangements. If staying with a host, make that clear in the invitation
- if using hotels, ensure dates and cities match the itinerary
Common mistakes
Booking one night merely to create a document; claiming to stay with family while submitting full-period hotels; leaving multi-city gaps.
- Booking one night merely to create a document
- claiming to stay with family while submitting full-period hotels
- leaving multi-city gaps
Illustrative exampleA 20-day trip with hotel proof for only three nights is not automatically fatal, but the remaining accommodation should be explained.
Before you apply again
IRCC now sends the officer’s decision note with most temporary-resident refusals since 29 July 2025, so check what came with your refusal first. The decision note or GCMS notes guide explains the difference, and the decoder explains the codes in them.
Scope noteIRCC does not publish an official ranked list of refusal reasons. This is a research-based classification of the legal grounds and evidence weaknesses that recur in real refusals. A weak itinerary or a new job is not itself a statutory ground — it affects whether the officer is satisfied under IRPR 179(b). This page is general information, not legal advice.
Where this comes from
Drawn from the Government of Canada’s published law and guidance. Check us against these pages:
Questions about this refusal
Not sure this is why you were refused?
Check first whether IRCC sent you the officer’s decision note with the refusal. For the fuller record, we can request your GCMS notes for you, or you can request them yourself, free, subject to what IRCC withholds.
Have us request them for youDo it yourself or let us do it?
