Reason 50 of 50 · Statutory inadmissibility and serious legal grounds
Classified asIRPA sections 39, 41, 42 and related provisions
Other legal grounds can include financial inadmissibility (inability/unwillingness to support oneself/dependants without adequate arrangements), failure to comply with IRPA, and in prescribed circumstances inadmissibility connected with a family member. A ministerial public-policy declaration can also bar temporary-resident status in rare cases.
IRPR 179 requires that the TRV applicant not be inadmissible. Therefore a strong purpose, funds package and home ties cannot cure a separate statutory bar unless the law provides an appropriate remedy or exception.
The precise statutory ground, previous removal/status history, family member circumstances, support arrangements and any applicable exemptions or remedies.
The same situation, presented two ways. The right-hand column is what a reapplication needs to look like.
Identify the exact legal issue from the refusal/decision notes and obtain qualified advice for statutory inadmissibility. Do not classify every ordinary “insufficient funds” refusal as financial inadmissibility under section 39 - these are different concepts.
Confusing weak travel funds with IRPA s.39 financial inadmissibility; ignoring an old deportation/removal issue; assuming a family member’s inadmissibility can never matter.
Legal inadmissibility must be diagnosed by the actual statutory provision, not by generic visa-consultancy terminology.
You cannot fix a reason you have not read. Your GCMS notes contain the officer's own words about your file, and requesting them is free — we publish every step.
[S1], [S11], [S12]. This page is general information, not legal advice.Other legal grounds can include financial inadmissibility (inability/unwillingness to support oneself/dependants without adequate arrangements), failure to comply with IRPA, and in prescribed circumstances inadmissibility connected with a family member. A ministerial public-policy declaration can also bar temporary-resident status in rare cases.
IRPR 179 requires that the TRV applicant not be inadmissible. Therefore a strong purpose, funds package and home ties cannot cure a separate statutory bar unless the law provides an appropriate remedy or exception.
The precise statutory ground, previous removal/status history, family member circumstances, support arrangements and any applicable exemptions or remedies.
Identify the exact legal issue from the refusal/decision notes and obtain qualified advice for statutory inadmissibility. Do not classify every ordinary “insufficient funds” refusal as financial inadmissibility under section 39 - these are different concepts.
Confusing weak travel funds with IRPA s.39 financial inadmissibility; ignoring an old deportation/removal issue; assuming a family member’s inadmissibility can never matter.
No. IRCC states that refiling the same information will likely not change the decision. A reapplication has to answer the specific concern the officer recorded — which is why you should read your GCMS notes first and find out exactly what that concern was.
Most refusals cite more than one concern, and only one of them is usually decisive. Your GCMS notes say which. Get them free, or send them to us and we will tell you exactly what to fix.