Government-LicensedLicence849/DC/PTA/PLA/LC-3/2024Valid till 22/07/2029
CAIPS Notes ApplyGCMS · CAIPS · CBSA Notes

Reason 47 of 50 · Statutory inadmissibility and serious legal grounds

Criminal inadmissibility

Classified asIRPA section 36 - statutory inadmissibility

YOUR FILEVISA OFFICERassesses47
Statutory ground — get adviceThis is a legal finding of inadmissibility, not an evidence gap. Speak to a Canadian immigration lawyer or an RCIC before reapplying.

What this actually means

Certain convictions or acts committed in or outside Canada can make a foreign national criminally inadmissible, depending on Canadian legal equivalency and the facts.

Why it matters to the officer

Criminal inadmissibility is a legal threshold issue, not a normal “ties” problem. IRCC notes that criminal conduct, including impaired driving in some circumstances, can affect admissibility.

IRPR 179 — WHAT THE OFFICER MUST BE SATISFIED OFYou applied in the correct wayYou will LEAVE by the end of your stayYou hold a valid travel documentYou are not inadmissibleMost visitor refusals turn on the second line — s. 179(b).

What the officer compares

Exact offence, jurisdiction, conviction/disposition, sentence, date completed, Canadian equivalent and whether rehabilitation/record-suspension rules may apply.

THE OFFICER CROSS-CHECKSExact offencejurisdictionconviction/dispositionsentencedate completedCanadian equivalent

Weak file vs strong file

The same situation, presented two ways. The right-hand column is what a reapplication needs to look like.

WHAT WEAKENS ITWHAT STRENGTHENS ITAssuming an offence is “minor”because it was minor in the homeObtain complete court/policerecords and legal advice whereomitting charges/convictionsrelying on a local policecertificate alone to determine

How to strengthen a reapplication

Obtain complete court/police records and legal advice where needed. Some applicants may be eligible for deemed rehabilitation, individual rehabilitation or a temporary resident permit depending on the circumstances.

Common mistakes

Assuming an offence is “minor” because it was minor in the home country; omitting charges/convictions; relying on a local police certificate alone to determine Canadian legal equivalency.

Illustrative example

Two offences with similar labels can have different Canadian consequences; exact legal analysis matters.

Before you reapply

THE ONLY SEQUENCE THAT WORKS1Read the notesFind the real reason2Fix that one thi…Not everything at on…3Prove it with do…Evidence, not claims4Then reapplyAnswering the object…

You cannot fix a reason you have not read. Your GCMS notes contain the officer's own words about your file, and requesting them is free we publish every step.

Scope note. IRCC does not publish an official ranked list of refusal reasons. This is a research-based classification of the legal grounds and evidence weaknesses that recur in real refusals. A weak itinerary or a new job is not itself a statutory ground — it affects whether the officer is satisfied under IRPR 179(b). Source references for this entry: [S11], [S12]. This page is general information, not legal advice.

Questions people ask about this refusal

Certain convictions or acts committed in or outside Canada can make a foreign national criminally inadmissible, depending on Canadian legal equivalency and the facts.

Criminal inadmissibility is a legal threshold issue, not a normal “ties” problem. IRCC notes that criminal conduct, including impaired driving in some circumstances, can affect admissibility.

Exact offence, jurisdiction, conviction/disposition, sentence, date completed, Canadian equivalent and whether rehabilitation/record-suspension rules may apply.

Obtain complete court/police records and legal advice where needed. Some applicants may be eligible for deemed rehabilitation, individual rehabilitation or a temporary resident permit depending on the circumstances.

Assuming an offence is “minor” because it was minor in the home country; omitting charges/convictions; relying on a local police certificate alone to determine Canadian legal equivalency.

No. IRCC states that refiling the same information will likely not change the decision. A reapplication has to answer the specific concern the officer recorded — which is why you should read your GCMS notes first and find out exactly what that concern was.

Not sure this is why you were refused?

Most refusals cite more than one concern, and only one of them is usually decisive. Your GCMS notes say which. Get them free, or send them to us and we will tell you exactly what to fix.

More in “Statutory inadmissibility and serious legal grounds

See all 50 refusal reasons →

CallWhatsApp